HomeAuto CatalogCar InsuranceAdd to bookmarks
 

GMC Sierra 3500 SL 4×4 caisse 6.0L

GMC Sierra 3500 SL




Engime
Engime
6.0L V8 16V
Numbers of cylinders
8
Maximum horsepower (hp. t rpm)
300/4400
Maximum torque (lb.- ft at rpm)
360/4000
Chasis
Standard transmission
5 speed Manual
Optional transmission
4 speed Automatic
Drive wheels
4×4
Steering
Recirculating ball
Turning circle (m)
6.9
Suspension front/rear
ind./ rigid axle
Weight distribution front/rea %
Data not available
Curb weight (kg)
2696
Brakes front/rear
discs/discs
Tires front/rear
LT245/75R16
Dimensions
Wheelbase (mm)
3378
Length (mm)
5644
Width (mm)
2441
Height (mm)
1877
Front legroom (mm)
1049
Median legroom (mm)
Does not apply
Rear legroom (mm)
Does not apply
Front headroom (mm)
1041
Median headroom (mm)
Does not apply
Rear headroom (mm)
Does not apply
Performances
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (sec)
11.50
Top speed  km/h
177
Stopping distance of 100 km/h(m)
54.00
Power/weight ratio
8.99
Coefficient of drag (Cd)
Data not available
Recommended fuel type
Unleaded
Average fuel consumption (L/100 km)
16.50
Volumes and Capacity
Towing capacity (kg)
6250
Interior volume (L)
Data not available
Trunk volume (L)
Data not available
Fuel tank capacity (L)
128.7

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

The best is yet to come

GM reacted forcefully to the Ford F and Dodge Ram models, not only by redesigning its big trucks, but by giving them a name that’s more inspired and expressive than the form C and K appellations. And so the GMC Sierra is easier to recognize, although the Chevrolet Silverado has the same front-end treatment as the previous generation. But all comparison ends right here, since both these vehicles have changed almost completely, save for a few mechanical features such as the base V6 engine. Also noteworthy are the new 4.7- and 5.-3 liter V8s, with a cast-iron block and aluminum cylinder heads, based on the V8 used to power the latest Corvette C5 and the Camaro. Furthermore, they’ve become more powerful for 2000. There’s an even sturdier version, the 6.0-liter, which is, however, available only on the 2500 series. Also entirely revamped is the chassis and the optional AWD system. These GM trucks are available in regular cab or four-door extended or crew cab versions, either with a short bed or with the now familiar long bed.The interior is much more appealing than it used to be, seats are more comfortable and several different configurations are possible. Access to the rear of the extended cab model is made easier with a panel that opens on the right and on the left. The dashboard, also very modern- looking, houses very easy-to-read instrumentation, but GM has decided to stick with the concept of positioning windshield wiper controls, speed governor and signal light controls all on the same arm, which leads to confusion. In passing, note that visibility on board is excellent.The more powerful V8s that power these trucks are impressive because of their performance capabilities, because of handling that is steadily approaching typical automobile- type handling and by the smoothness of manoeuvres, even in 4×4 mode on bumpy roads. Of course, the stiffer the suspension (for more loading capacity), the more feedback occupants get on poor road surfaces, but this is no big deal. Some whistling caused by the rush of air over the curve of the windshield disturbs the otherwise quiet ride.

The AWD Autotrac version works like a traction control system. Another interesting characteristic is the automatic transmission, available on GM trucks with a Tow/Haul function that when activated can stretch its speeds and delay shifting to make acceleration easier.

PROS
Excellent visibility
Engines even more energetic
Very good handling

CONS
Wind noise
The diesel engine is overdue
Overloaded turn signal arm

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: * * *
Passenger: no data

 



Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © All rights reserved, carworldonline.info, 2007

download movies | movies online | movies | films download

sony ericsson xperia x1 review