Mazda Tribute 2.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

It’s as Sporty as Can Be

According to Mazda’s designers, the Tribute was designed to be the sports sedan of SUVs. That might be stretching it a little, but the Tribute is certain to seriously challenge the likes of RAV4 and CR-V. This compact-size crossover vehicle is aimed at the cost-conscious SUV buyer, but offers many features found only on larger, much more expensive vehicles.

The Tribute is available in 3 trim levels, DX, LX and ES. The DX is powered by a 130-hp DOHC, 2-liter 4-cylinder engine with a 5-speed manual transmission. The DX V6, LX and ES models feature a 200-hp, DOHC, 3-liter V-6, mated to a 4-speed automatic transmission. Tribute is available with front-wheel drive or an on-demand 4-wheel-drive system that can seamlessly transfer up to 50 percent of the power to the rear wheels. In tough situations, the coupling to the rear wheels can be locked electrically.

Although somewhat plain, the DX is still reasonably well equipped inside. Along with its mechanical upgrades, the LX offers more convenience features, such as adjustable driver’s seat height. Inside, the Tribute offers seating for 5, with plenty of cargo space behind the second seat. Rear seatbacks fold down in a split for greater cargo carrying flexibility.

With the rear seat completely folded, it’s possible to carry a 4-by-8-foot sheet of plywood (although with the rear window open). Both front and rear seatbacks recline for added passenger comfort. Visibility is good all around, but the stylish, sloping hood allows a commanding view of the road ahead. Entry and exit are made easier by the Tribute’s low step-in height and large doors. The interior is tastefully laid out with good ergonomics and a minivan-like dashboard that is separated from the center console. Instruments and controls are conventional and easy to use. The only oddity is the steering column-mounted shift lever for the automatic transmission. The manual transmission gets a floor shifter.On the road, the Tribute’s unibody design and independent front and rear suspension give it a sporty feel. While no sports car, the Tribute has excellent overall manners. The ride is composed enough to handle rough roads with ease but exhibits little body roll under normal driving conditions. Acceleration with the V-6 engine feels better than it really is. The on-demand 4-wheel-drive engagement is smooth and transparent. The lack of a 2-speed transfer case limits the Tribute to the role of an all-weather vehicle rather than a true off-roader. Even so, its styling, roominess and comfort are sure to make it a real competitor in the small-SUV market.

PROS
Ride/handling
Cargo space
Sensible size

CONS
Front headrests not adjustable
Steering is a bit numb
No antiskid system (front wheel drive)

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: * * * *
Passenger: * * * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda Protege 2.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

A sure value

"Happy people lead uneventful lives", to paraphrase a French saying, and that’s exactly the case for the Protegй. Since it’s revamping in 2000, this model has enjoyed enormous success with consumers looking for an economical and roomy automobile. In light of such a positive glow, it isn’t surprising that Mazda decided to make small trim changes.The Protegй justifiably boasts that it’s roomier than any of its rivals. Given current and future government regulations with regard to passive safety devices, more particularly crash resistance, the new generation has dropped a few centimetres here and there and as a result, a few millimetres less room inside, but not enough to start worrying about the competition.

The Protegй offers easy access for passengers and driver alike and the ideal driving position is easy to find. Whoever gets behind the wheel is most comfortable aboard the ES (and yes, we know it’s more expensive). It’s also the only version to offer a height-adjustable seat. Still, the first few minutes travelling in the Protegй are fine, but after a while front-seat passengers will begin to feel the effects of the metal frame that runs from the bottom of the seat to shoulder height.

Now for a look at the dashboard, which falls a bit short of offering truly detailed instrumentation (you can’t find a tachometer on this model unless you go for the LX version).

Main controls are within easy reach for the driver, but not all of them are easy to use. For example, air conditioning controls are far too small to use if you happen to have gloves on. The standard radio and CD player on the ES and LX is positioned very high on the center console, above a tiny space designed, supposedly, to store your CD collection. On a completely different note: rear windows roll down almost all the way (a rare feature), but boy are they flimsy! Watch out for rattling when they’re all the way down and you happen to be driving in high winds. To continue with our tour of the inside, access is easy for rear-seat passengers and there’s plenty of head and leg room. The trunk also earns high marks for its volume and the fact that it offers easy access into the bargain.

Overall, manufacturing quality is excellent and the Protegй has the marked advantage of good finishing, especially for a car in its price range.Mazda is trying to attract younger buyers with its new-wave Protegй, and so designers have paid special attention to handling. But before we go for a test drive, let’s look at the model’s nuts and bolts. Peek under the hood of the SE and meet the 1.6-liter, four-cylinder engine. Those who choose the LX or ES versions get the 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine which has powered this model for one year now.

Although we were unable to check data using our usual performance evaluation instruments, in our opinion at lower speeds the 1.6-liter four-cylinder was quieter than the 2.0- liter. On the other hand, it runs out of breath quickly when climbing hills and can be quite noisy during acceleration.

All the same, this car’s mechanical system is very good, even with the automatic transmission. What about the manual unit? Our rating is satisfactory but nothing beyond because of its rubbery gear shift and a ratio that’s just a bit too long. On the plus side, the clutch is smooth, with perfect progressiveness. Of course, the 2.0-liter is smoother in the lower rpm range and during acceleration and pick-up is more energetic. What remains to be seen is whether the higher price tag really comes with the equivalent amount of additional driveability. Mazda has made the Protegй easier to drive, but at the cost of a stiffer suspension. With its minimal travel, there’s plenty of feedback on bumpy roads. However, the Protegй offers excellent stability, helped along by a very precise steering system that contributes significantly to providing the driver with the sense of control so cherished by Honda fans.

PROS
Driveability
Resistant and reliable mechanics
Roomy interior

CONS
Uncomfortable bucket seats
Stripped-down DX version
Some poorly designed controls

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
 Driver: * * * *
Passenger: * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda Protege5 2.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

A sure value

"Happy people lead uneventful lives", to paraphrase a French saying, and that’s exactly the case for the Protegй. Since it’s revamping in 2000, this model has enjoyed enormous success with consumers looking for an economical and roomy automobile. In light of such a positive glow, it isn’t surprising that Mazda decided to make small trim changes.The Protegй justifiably boasts that it’s roomier than any of its rivals. Given current and future government regulations with regard to passive safety devices, more particularly crash resistance, the new generation has dropped a few centimetres here and there and as a result, a few millimetres less room inside, but not enough to start worrying about the competition.

The Protegй offers easy access for passengers and driver alike and the ideal driving position is easy to find. Whoever gets behind the wheel is most comfortable aboard the ES (and yes, we know it’s more expensive). It’s also the only version to offer a height-adjustable seat. Still, the first few minutes travelling in the Protegй are fine, but after a while front-seat passengers will begin to feel the effects of the metal frame that runs from the bottom of the seat to shoulder height.

Now for a look at the dashboard, which falls a bit short of offering truly detailed instrumentation (you can’t find a tachometer on this model unless you go for the LX version).

Main controls are within easy reach for the driver, but not all of them are easy to use. For example, air conditioning controls are far too small to use if you happen to have gloves on. The standard radio and CD player on the ES and LX is positioned very high on the center console, above a tiny space designed, supposedly, to store your CD collection. On a completely different note: rear windows roll down almost all the way (a rare feature), but boy are they flimsy! Watch out for rattling when they’re all the way down and you happen to be driving in high winds. To continue with our tour of the inside, access is easy for rear-seat passengers and there’s plenty of head and leg room. The trunk also earns high marks for its volume and the fact that it offers easy access into the bargain.

Overall, manufacturing quality is excellent and the Protegй has the marked advantage of good finishing, especially for a car in its price range.Mazda is trying to attract younger buyers with its new-wave Protegй, and so designers have paid special attention to handling. But before we go for a test drive, let’s look at the model’s nuts and bolts. Peek under the hood of the SE and meet the 1.6-liter, four-cylinder engine. Those who choose the LX or ES versions get the 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine which has powered this model for one year now.

Although we were unable to check data using our usual performance evaluation instruments, in our opinion at lower speeds the 1.6-liter four-cylinder was quieter than the 2.0- liter. On the other hand, it runs out of breath quickly when climbing hills and can be quite noisy during acceleration.

All the same, this car’s mechanical system is very good, even with the automatic transmission. What about the manual unit? Our rating is satisfactory but nothing beyond because of its rubbery gear shift and a ratio that’s just a bit too long. On the plus side, the clutch is smooth, with perfect progressiveness. Of course, the 2.0-liter is smoother in the lower rpm range and during acceleration and pick-up is more energetic. What remains to be seen is whether the higher price tag really comes with the equivalent amount of additional driveability. Mazda has made the Protegй easier to drive, but at the cost of a stiffer suspension. With its minimal travel, there’s plenty of feedback on bumpy roads. However, the Protegй offers excellent stability, helped along by a very precise steering system that contributes significantly to providing the driver with the sense of control so cherished by Honda fans.

PROS
Driveability
Resistant and reliable mechanics
Roomy interior

CONS
Uncomfortable bucket seats
Stripped-down DX version
Some poorly designed controls

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
 Driver: * * * *
Passenger: * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda MX-5 Miata Base

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

The good old days

The Miata has definitely changed since its introduction in 1989. Seen straight on, the little Japanese model still has the same smiling face, the primary attraction for more than 500,000 consumers worldwide. Its eyelids don’t close anymore, but as compensation, its headlights seem to glow happily, much like the eyes of the owners who enjoy driving it in the heat of heady summer nights.With no additional usable space to offer, the Miata now bills itself as a model capable of accommodating two golf bags (but you’d better not be a PGA player!). To make the trunk roomier, Mazda has positioned the emergency tire and battery a bit deeper.

The tachometer and speedometer have lost their silver housing but have adopted a more modern look that’s easy to admire while gazing through the nice little steering wheel designed by Nardi (in genuine wood, just like gearshift knob and the hand brake). The radio is located in the upper portion of the centre console, relegating the air conditioning system and its new and more practical controls to the middle portion. Immediately in front of the gear shift lever is a lock used to deactivate the passenger-side air bag if you happen to be traveling with someone younger than 12 years old up front.

Since the Miata is available with leather upholstery, it’s too bad that seats aren’t heated – a feature that’s particularly important and highly appreciated for drivers who take to the roads even if it’s winter. In the same vein of thought, the steering wheel doesn’t tilt, seats come with a minimum of adjustment possibilities (and a lack of support), cup holders are positioned very oddly on the centre console and  you have to raise the armrest to use them, and the soft-top housing seems to be quite fragile, besides calling for relatively skilled handling if you have big hands. When the top is up, side supports hinder visibility and force drivers to be extra careful when overtaking other vehicles and the opaque windshield perimeter may provide sturdiness, but it restricts the field of vision on tight corners.The Miata ’ s engine boasts 142 horses and is linked to a 5-speeds transmission ( 6-speed optionnal ). Handling proves to be a bit tricky since it ’ s easy to confuse the third and fifth gears. By reducing engine and consequently noise levels, the efficient 6-speed gear box makes it not only possible for the engine to work at higher rpms, but it also results in better pick-up, although acceleration times remain unchanged. Automatic transmission is available as an option but despite past improvements, Mazda doesn’t expect it to be very popular with customers. In fact, only a half-dozen "automatic" Miatas were sold on the entire Canadian market last year.

In addition to letting you enjoy the sunshine, the Miata is fun to drive – especially on secondary roads, where its driveability is at its very best. Peppy and agile, the Miata has no qualms about behaving like exactly what it is, a toy. The ideal weight allocation (50% toward the front and 50% toward the back) gives it neutral handling and encourages sporty driving styles. The quick, direct and responsive steering system lets you correct rear-end slippage effectively and spells precision on tight corners. In fact, road conditions are the only negative of this otherwise superbe convertible, whose overly firm suspension will make you feel each bump without the slightest filtering.

The braking system, backed by ABS brakes (standard only on the top-of-the-line version) are efficient, but the pedal on the test model we drove lacked firmness. You can’t have everything! Beautiful in its simplicity, fun to drive, capable of exciting performance levels, the Miata is a perfect choice for anyone who wants to enjoy the thrill of riding in the wind without the hassle of begging for a banker’s indulgence.

PROS
Cute appearance
Reliability
Sporty behaviour

CONS
Lack of storage spaces
Cramped interior
Precarious visibility

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: * * * *
Passenger: * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda MPV DX 2.5L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

An in-between model

Although minivan sales have begun to drop in recent months, it is still profitable – even mandatory – for every builder to make a foray into this particular market niche. This is all the more true since the supremacy of Chrysler’s "Magic Wagon" concept (Town & Country, Caravan and Voyager) seems to be much less threatening than it once was.

If for no other reason, Mazda sees this as a golden opportunity, especially since the card up the corporation’s sleeve is an MPV that was completely revamped recently and like the first-generation MPV, is likely to go to the top of the charts of bestselling "imported" minivans.Forget the shoebox styling of the first-generation MPV. The new model is remarkable for its flowing, aerodynamic lines (Cx: 0.34) and, at long last, side doors that slide just like the competition’s do. And if power doors are out of the question, though most similar models have them, (our doors are lighter, is Mazda ’ s justification), the MPV sets itself apart from the pack by being the first minivan in North America to offer fully operational windows in the rear, the better to accommodate the little ones travelling in those particular seats. A good idea? Yes, provided you don’t opt for the DX package (the least expensive), equipped with a pair of handles that are not very practical if you happen to be travelling with small children. Adults will also have good reason to dislike the DX: its standard equipment doesn’t even include a height- adjustable steering wheel, much less cruise control.

Before we get out the tape measure, remember that the MPV was developed to meet the needs of several different markets, including the North American market where consumers often think that bigger is better. This said, you’ll understand that this new Mazda comes in a slightly smaller size than the rivals it’s being pitted against. No need to dig out your calculators: the MPV does indeed provide less space for second- and third-row seats that the Caravan does. To give you a clearer picture, let’s just say that the MPV’s inside is modelled after the Nissan Quest and, like the latter, it can accommodate six passengers comfortably.

Middle seat passengers can socialize to their hearts’ content since one of the bucket seats (the right-hand one) can be moved along the vehicle’s length, a feature also found on the Honda Odyssey (note: unlike the mechanism found on the Odyssey, the MPV’s seat can be moved even when occupied). And like the Odyssey, the MPV proposes a rear seat that disappears completely under the floor to create a perfectly flat storage space, not to mention the fact that it folds down to offer prime space for two on your next trip to the drive-in movies, for example.

The passenger compartment is as carefully put together as it is versatile: detailed instrumentation, a four-spoke steering wheel with plenty of padding, an emergency brake positioned close to the driver’s right hand – in short, unlike certain models concocted by the competiton, when you climb aboard an MPV you won’t feel as if you’re driving a schoolbus.As far as nuts and boltsare concerned, remember that Mazda traded the greedy 3-litre V6 formerly found under the MPV’s hood for a U.S.-designed 2.5-litre V6. In fact, this V6 is an old acquaintance: it’s none other than Ford’s Duratec V6. Another good thing to know is that the MPV is now an up-front kind of model. In other words, it’s a front-wheel drive while the previous generation came in two configurations: rear-wheel or four-wheel. And speaking of the latter, Mazda indicates that all-wheel drive is out of the question for its new minivan, even if it proved to be the most popular choice for those who bought the previous generation MPV. The MPV is available solely with an automatic 4-speed transmission which, rumour has it, is similar to the unit used to power the 626, except that the slightly balky gearshift lever is mounted on the steering wheel column.

In practise, the 2.5-litre V6 proved to be smooth and energetic… with two people aboard. When the entire family comes too, it’s a whole different story, especially if you happen to be in country that ’ s the least bit hilly. If it is, the V6 is very loud and runs out of steam as soon as you step down hard on the gas pedal. Too bad! The well-balanced MPV chassis deserves a good 30 extra horses.

The light, responsive steering system corners extremely well (especially when the MPV is equipped with 16-inch tires) and can handle traffic problem-free, mostly because of its excellent turning radius (the best in this category) and its resulting agility. As well, the new MPV shows minimal roll and is reassuringly stable. This is a significant improvement over the previous generation which tended to sway at the least breath of wind. Lighter than the model it is destined to replace, the new MPV has more braking power, a plus abetted by a pedal that is easier to work. However, there are three less-positive aspects: stopping the vehicle involves the classic disc-drum combination that fails to capitalize on the MPV’s vaunted braking power allocation, the anti-lock system is available solely on more expensive packages (LX and ES), and lastly, there is no traction control, a feature that is invaluable on slippery surfaces. The front-end suspension is composed of the conventional MacPherson struts, while the rear boasts a torsion bar that provides better stability when the vehicle is fully loaded, and increases the model’s interior room. However there are two sides to every story and said suspension tends to hop when the minivan is driven on poorly paved roads. What’s the final word after this road test of the MPV? First of all, this is a nicely sized minivan, fun to drive and available in a very competitive price range. On the down side, some people will criticize the engine’s marginal performance levels and the lack of certain accessories (power side doors and video equipment) desgned to make using this type of vehicle a much more pleasant and positive experience for families.

PROS
Youthful, exciting styling
Versatile passenger compartment
Driveability

CONS
Marginal V6 performance levels
Lack of some safety features (see article)
 Stubborn shifting

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
 Driver: * * * *
Passenger: * * * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda Mellenia S 2.3L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

Dressed for Success

Mazda has updated its flagship sedan last year with more aggressive styling, new interior and improved handling and ride quality in the hopes of attracting more attention from upscale buyers. Competition comes from the Lexus ES 300. The Millenia, which comes only in S version, is slightly longer than previous year’s model. European-like design cues are now more noticeable in the hood, front fenders, grille, front bumpers and headlights.A luxurious feel has been created inside with the addition of a power lumbar support driver’s seat, a 2-tone interior treatment, improved switch and interior lighting, leather-wrapped shift knob and better sound insulation for quieter motoring. New steering-wheel-mounted audio controls have also been added. There’s also a new center console with padded armrest, additional power outlet and space for 10 CDs and 4 cupholders.

That said, the relatively small interior undermines the notion of luxury. Five occupants will find themselves in close quarters. Entry and exit are easy in the front, but the narrow rear doors make the back seat harder to reach. Visibility for the driver is above average in all directions. The trunk offers good, if not voluminous, space, and there’s plenty of storage space in the cabin. Fit and finish are first class both inside and out.The Millenia S features a Miller-cycle, 2.3-liter V-6 that develops 210 hp despite its relatively small displacement. The Miller-cycle engine processes incoming air and fuel differently from conventional engines to improve engine efficiency. Although it uses a compressor to force additional air into the engine, it isn’t merely a variation of turbocharging or supercharging. The innovative engine gives the Millenia S surprisingly spirited performance. The engine’s small displacement also makes fuel economy noteworthy, particularly for a 6-cylinder. We averaged 10 L/100Km in mostly exuberant driving. Despite its muscle, the engine is smooth and quiet and works well with the 4-speed automatic transmission. It shifts almost imperceptibly, even under heavy throttle. An all-independent suspension provides a firm yet cushioned ride with good control and a feeling of agility. The speed-sensitive steering feels precise, with good on-center action. The standard 4-wheel antilock disc brakes provide excellent stopping power. Revised suspension components make for better handling characteristics than last year’s models.

 PROS
Drivetrain
Ride
Braking

CONS
Interior room
Front-wheel drive

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda B4000 Cab Plus 4.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

Double take

Now it’s a well-known fact, the Mazda B-Series is the Japanese double of the popular Ford Ranger. Stylists infused it with a more Japanese personality, a complex task to say the least considering the fact that the chassis, cab and doors had to remain identical to those used on the Ranger! So all that was left to "play with" were the fenders, grille and bed.Perhaps tired of redoubling its efforts on a regular basis, as far as the interior of this model goes, Mazda was content to add its logo and that’s just about all. Still, the regular cab version grew longer by a few millimetres last year, as did the Ranger, the better to accommodate occupants and baggage. In the all-wheel drive version, access to the B- Series is still difficult given the high ground clearance, and the extended cab version isn’t as roomy as you’d think by looking at it. On the other hand, the noise level in the passenger compartment is particularly low (except on all- wheel drive versions, which all have bigger tires), visibility is excellent, instrumentation is easy to read and controls are within easy reach.The weight distribution typical of trucks never results in the king of road stability found on a car, regardless of what changes manufacturers make. Regardless, the B-Series’ acceleration, pick-up and braking compares well to what you find on several automobiles currently on the market. And this is even truer since last year’s move to replace the puny 2.3- liter four-cylinder with a stronger and smoother 2.5-liter that works extremely well with either transmission choice (manual or automatic) – our preference being the automatic. For more exhilarating performance capabilities, there’s always the 4.0-liter V6 (a SOHC). On the comfort scale, the B- Series earns a few extra points thanks to a redesigned and smoother front suspension. In contrast, the rear suspension obviously does not take kindly to bumpy roads.

PROS
Four-door model
Good automatic transmission
Exemplary manufacturing quality

CONS
Uncooperative rear suspension
Obstinate manual transmission
Marginal four-cylinder

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: no data
Passenger: * * * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda B3000 Cab Plus 3.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

Double take

Now it’s a well-known fact, the Mazda B-Series is the Japanese double of the popular Ford Ranger. Stylists infused it with a more Japanese personality, a complex task to say the least considering the fact that the chassis, cab and doors had to remain identical to those used on the Ranger! So all that was left to "play with" were the fenders, grille and bed.Perhaps tired of redoubling its efforts on a regular basis, as far as the interior of this model goes, Mazda was content to add its logo and that’s just about all. Still, the regular cab version grew longer by a few millimetres last year, as did the Ranger, the better to accommodate occupants and baggage. In the all-wheel drive version, access to the B- Series is still difficult given the high ground clearance, and the extended cab version isn’t as roomy as you’d think by looking at it. On the other hand, the noise level in the passenger compartment is particularly low (except on all- wheel drive versions, which all have bigger tires), visibility is excellent, instrumentation is easy to read and controls are within easy reach.The weight distribution typical of trucks never results in the king of road stability found on a car, regardless of what changes manufacturers make. Regardless, the B-Series’ acceleration, pick-up and braking compares well to what you find on several automobiles currently on the market. And this is even truer since last year’s move to replace the puny 2.3- liter four-cylinder with a stronger and smoother 2.5-liter that works extremely well with either transmission choice (manual or automatic) – our preference being the automatic. For more exhilarating performance capabilities, there’s always the 4.0-liter V6 (a SOHC). On the comfort scale, the B- Series earns a few extra points thanks to a redesigned and smoother front suspension. In contrast, the rear suspension obviously does not take kindly to bumpy roads.

PROS
Four-door model
Good automatic transmission
Exemplary manufacturing quality

CONS
Uncooperative rear suspension
Obstinate manual transmission
Marginal four-cylinder

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: no data
Passenger: * * * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda B3000 3.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

Double take

Now it’s a well-known fact, the Mazda B-Series is the Japanese double of the popular Ford Ranger. Stylists infused it with a more Japanese personality, a complex task to say the least considering the fact that the chassis, cab and doors had to remain identical to those used on the Ranger! So all that was left to "play with" were the fenders, grille and bed.Perhaps tired of redoubling its efforts on a regular basis, as far as the interior of this model goes, Mazda was content to add its logo and that’s just about all. Still, the regular cab version grew longer by a few millimetres last year, as did the Ranger, the better to accommodate occupants and baggage. In the all-wheel drive version, access to the B- Series is still difficult given the high ground clearance, and the extended cab version isn’t as roomy as you’d think by looking at it. On the other hand, the noise level in the passenger compartment is particularly low (except on all- wheel drive versions, which all have bigger tires), visibility is excellent, instrumentation is easy to read and controls are within easy reach.The weight distribution typical of trucks never results in the king of road stability found on a car, regardless of what changes manufacturers make. Regardless, the B-Series’ acceleration, pick-up and braking compares well to what you find on several automobiles currently on the market. And this is even truer since last year’s move to replace the puny 2.3- liter four-cylinder with a stronger and smoother 2.5-liter that works extremely well with either transmission choice (manual or automatic) – our preference being the automatic. For more exhilarating performance capabilities, there’s always the 4.0-liter V6 (a SOHC). On the comfort scale, the B- Series earns a few extra points thanks to a redesigned and smoother front suspension. In contrast, the rear suspension obviously does not take kindly to bumpy roads.

PROS
Four-door model
Good automatic transmission
Exemplary manufacturing quality

CONS
Uncooperative rear suspension
Obstinate manual transmission
Marginal four-cylinder

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: no data
Passenger: * * * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »

Mazda 626 LX 2.0L

REVIEWS AND ROAD TESTS

Operating in the red

Do you know how frustrating it is to realize that your bank account is empty? Well that’s exactly the impression I got from the 626 in its latest guise. Forced for financial reasons to use just about anything at hand, in 1998 Mazda presented a logical extension of its 626. The result: a good car, but one lacking any strong inspiration.Yes, the 626′s passenger compartment will give you a strong feeling of dйjа vu. At a time when car-builders cut into budgets with chainsaws and let suppliers feel the pinch, this passenger compartment’s design seems to go against the trend set in recent years. The upholstery on seats – which happen to be very comfortable, by the way – looks elegant and plastic materials are sturdy. The slightly revamped instrument panel boasts a new-look air conditioning panel with rotary controls. Central vents swing back and forth for maximum passenger comfort. A bit lower, which means the driver’s eyes leave the road, are the controls for the radio and built-in CD player; options include a cassette player.Neutral, stable and predictable, the 626 fights off the understeering that used to appear quicker on previous versions. It also absorbs road defects with more smoothness and less effort and completely noiselessly. The variable-assistance steering system is still imprecise at centre, an old defect. The 626 loses some points when it comes to handling due to a considerably longer turning radius. The LX-V6 and ES-V6 have quieter mechanical systems capable of higher performance levels, but don’t be fooled into thinking that three extra pound-feet of torque have made it less slack in the lower rpm range, a flaw that is somewhat less obvious when the engine is coupled with a manual transmission, with impeccable shifting.

While most 626s show a loss of stability during emergency braking, models powered by the four-cylinder are deprived of a four-disc brake system and show a loss of stopping power. The only choice is the disc-drum duo, which gets its job done efficiently. What to think of the 626? It’s a reliable and well-finished automobile, but decidedly less talented than most of its rivals.

PROS
Reliability
Comfortable ride
Good handling

CONS
Pick-up at lower engine speeds (V6)
Lack of braking stability
Lack of originality

CRASH TEST (five stars indicate the best protection)
Driver: * * * *
Passenger: * * *

Posted in Mazda | No Comments »